tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post3477855328226953932..comments2024-03-23T16:23:13.312+08:00Comments on CISCO Dreamer: NAT Stateful FailoverPetehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14603511201107810183noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-48211285073560005362011-10-09T18:27:55.926+08:002011-10-09T18:27:55.926+08:00any dynamic nat stateful failover examples?any dynamic nat stateful failover examples?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-15216831595532879582011-09-17T15:17:02.319+08:002011-09-17T15:17:02.319+08:00Nice doc thanks. I however have one question. Al...Nice doc thanks. I however have one question. All cisco documentation advises that the stateful nat id should be unique between both routers and this is also shown in their config examples.<br /><br />When I look at your example above the same snat id is in use. I have configured both methods and they seem to both work. You mention that the snat id is only locally significant however the cisco docs I have read seem to suggest that each router requires a unique id..<br /><br />Thanksskeensterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17926322926777178715noreply@blogger.com