tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post5990416856442023796..comments2024-03-23T16:23:13.312+08:00Comments on CISCO Dreamer: EBGP MultihopPetehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14603511201107810183noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-72249360539096531982013-05-17T17:13:39.571+08:002013-05-17T17:13:39.571+08:00when ebgp-multihop command is given , bgp connecti...when ebgp-multihop command is given , bgp connection is getting re established ... is this correct behaviour ??? vijnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-65163146592205618032012-08-21T04:02:37.027+08:002012-08-21T04:02:37.027+08:00The picture here seems to illustrate a multi-path ...The picture here seems to illustrate a multi-path BGP session, not multi-hop BGP seessionAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-2655001136758082062012-02-07T15:52:31.789+08:002012-02-07T15:52:31.789+08:00By default, Load balancing is per destination whic...By default, Load balancing is per destination which means if a host used s0/0 then any other host would use s0/1.<br /><br />If you think about real load balance which means per packet, apply this command:<br /><br />-if)#ip load-sharing per-packet<br /><br />which means the same host can send over these two links, try with traceroute command.Mustafa Nassefhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05323507633738314059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-61864484788008792552011-04-20T19:10:26.903+08:002011-04-20T19:10:26.903+08:00Can we load balance between these 2 EBGP links? If...Can we load balance between these 2 EBGP links? If yes, what is the configuration?Ranjeet Badhehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05292077364726487252noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-13614982993008826362009-10-22T06:37:43.006+08:002009-10-22T06:37:43.006+08:00Firstly its not possible to make R2 and R3 iBGP ne...Firstly its not possible to make R2 and R3 iBGP neighbors because your scenario states they are in AS 200 and 300 respectively. Secondly, it is not practical to create eBGP neighborship between R1 and R3. eBGP multihop is used for Adjacent AS which are not directly connected. There is no need to define a static route between R1 and R3, R2 will advertise the routes learned from R3 to R1 showing R2's adjacent interface ip address as the nexthop.Petehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14603511201107810183noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-18589204764415001882009-10-22T03:05:55.978+08:002009-10-22T03:05:55.978+08:00Salaam... Can u explain ebgp multihop in three rou...Salaam... Can u explain ebgp multihop in three router scenario.<br /><br />Like R1------- R2-------- R3<br /><br />R1- AS no 100<br /><br />R2 - AS no 200<br /><br />R3 - AS no 300<br /><br />eBGP neighbor establishment between R1-R3 & vice versa<br /><br />iBGP neighbor establishment between R2-R3<br /><br /><br />Is it necessary to define a static route between R1 & R3??????Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1200580631182730878.post-45346346280970879392009-08-19T19:41:20.162+08:002009-08-19T19:41:20.162+08:00Nice one brad fete. ang lufet mo tlga fafa....Nice one brad fete. ang lufet mo tlga fafa....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com